June 2005
Gov't Crackdown On Radio Gov't Crackdown On Radio
"I'd rather have a boring station than no station at all." With 13
years of hindsight and constant reminders of his station's occasional
indiscretions, WSUC's current station manager Christopher Ortega can't
take any chances. On June 21, 1992, a student DJ at SUNY-Cortland's
WSUC played Kid Rock's "Yo-Da-Lin In The Valley," which explicitly
describes one of the Kid's favorite sexual acts. All it took was this
one mid-afternoon lapse in judgment, and the school owed the US
government $23,750 (later reduced to a little over four grand for
complying with the FCC).
As if Ortega isn't facing enough internal pressure from his faculty,
the House Of Representatives is proposing a bill tentatively titled the
"Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act Of 2005," that would raise the roof
on fines to $500,000, while adding personal culpability for DJs,
musicians and anyone else freely expressing him or herself on public
airwaves. The Senate has yet to approve the bill—its current revision
brings the maximum fine down to a "modest" $325,000 and doesn't include
any personal culpability clause— but if it does, it could spur an
arctic chill on free expression in broadcasting.
"You end up in a situation where… artists either censor themselves,
which is problematic in terms of the creation of art, or broadcasters
make certain programming decisions about who they're not even going to
give access to, on the chance that they may run into a problem," says
Rebecca Rhine, Assistant National Executive Director for the American
Federation Of Television And Radio Artists (AFTRA).
Tim Winter, Executive Director for the media watchgroup Parents
Television Council, agrees there are greater constitutional issues that
need examining, and that the current maximum fine of $32,500, which is
"a heck of a lot of money," as he puts it, should already be enough to
inspire college and noncommercial stations to obey current obscenity
laws. A spokesperson for the FCC's Enforcement Bureau declined to
comment on the bill as it is "proposed legislation."
"We're living in a climate of fear right now," says KPFA/Berkley,
California's Music Director Luis Medina. "We have a responsibility of
keeping our lines of communication open. We have the responsibility of
playing new music, of not being afraid of expressing ourselves." Medina
says that his station, the America's first community-funded station and
a Pacifica member, will actively challenge the bill on-air and educate
listeners on its implications. He maintains that broadcasters do not
need to sacrifice edginess or integrity to adhere to the proposed to
bill. "It's the responsibility of college radio, public radio,
alternative radio, satellite radio even, to put out the truth—to talk
about the subjects that aren't given the play, that are being
whitewashed."
But what if your voice fails to reach any ears in the first place? The
main concern of KALX general manager Sandra Wasson stretches beyond the
fact that one student's bad choice (a half-million dollar bad choice)
could put her entire station out of commission. As part of the
University Of California system, she says, the Berkeley station
wouldn't even be able to petition its senators because it's a
student-funded state organization. The call to arms, then, lies in the
faculty, students and concerned listeners as individuals.
AFTRA provides a petition on its website (www.aftra.org) addressing the
constitutionality of the Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act, which will
be passed along to Senate co-sponsors, the Senate Commerce Committee
and individual state senators. The Future Of Music Coalition
(www.futureofmusic.org) features a similar letter that it submitted to
the Senate in March. In addition, the American Federation Of Musicians
stated in a press release that they will continue to oppose the
Senate's fining of individual performers, which they see as a free
speech violation.
For those who have no trouble speaking up to the powers that be, a lot
comes down to sheer ingenuity. "We have to be smarter about it," says
Medina. "It's not going to shut us up and it shouldn't shut anybody
else up who is intelligent and knows how to program and can get around
this thing… You have to have a strong network of advocacy that is going
to influence our politicians." WSUC's Ortega thinks, quite simply, that
the House's proposal is foolish. Chasing after individual DJs with a
$500,000 fine would be like "trying to milk a turnip."
Still, he agrees that prevention is the cure. "I'm sure we could get
the whole station mobilized," he says. "It's a lot easier for the radio
station to get into trouble than to get itself out of it."
- Kory Grow |
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
Sign-Up for the Newsletter
|
